Help your students pass all four parts.

Spot the students who may need a conversation before their next exam window. Turn subject-level signals into timely, human follow-up.

What faculty see: early signals, not more content.

  • Student roster

    See an assigned caseload in one place, with sorting that brings weaker subject signals to the top.

  • Weakest subject per student

    See the subject areas a student may need to revisit, without exposing individual question responses.

  • Follow up queue

    Turn a concern into a follow-up item and keep track of the next conversation.

  • Cohort view

    Explore aggregated subject patterns with the appropriate program-level role.

A caseload you can act on

Prototype demonstration data only. Example identities are obscured; no school or student data is used here.

Students work the problem. Faculty see where to follow up.

Students move from a subject guide to focused practice and a timed mock. The prototype presents subject-level feedback; faculty views are scoped to their role.

For the student

Read cited material, answer original practice questions, and revisit weaker subjects.

For the tutor

Scan assigned students, open domain trends, and create a follow-up when support is needed.

Subject signals, not an outcome promise

What sits behind the signals matters.

Questions and study materials are organised by exam subject. Explanations include source context, and content is written and reviewed before it is used in the student experience.

01

Written for a subject

Guides and original questions follow the published exam areas.

02

Reviewed for clarity

Questions, answers and distractors go through a clinical review workflow.

03

Cited for review

Students can inspect explanation sources and image citations when reviewing.

The right information. The right people.

Built to FERPA standards and ready for your audit

Faculty views are scoped by role. Assigned caseloads support tutor follow-up; program-level views bring subject patterns together. The public screenshots use demonstration data with example identities obscured.

Review access, data handling and your program’s requirements during the walkthrough. The enquiry collects institutional contact details only, never student information.

A pilot that starts small.

Begin with one cohort. Review what faculty can see, how access is scoped, and whether the workflow suits your program before discussing a per-seat licence. Pricing is available on request.

The enquiry form below collects institutional contact information only. Do not include student information.

  1. 01

    Walk through

    See the student and faculty sides together.

  2. 02

    Pilot one cohort

    Agree on scope, access and the follow-up workflow.

  3. 03

    Review and decide

    Assess fit before discussing a per-seat licence.

Tell us about your program.

Discuss your cohort and your follow-up needs. This prototype form collects no student data.

Prototype enquiry: saved in this browser only, not sent to our team. Please do not enter student data.